Zionism, the rallying word behind Islamic rage! Zyonism, in search of solutions through understanding.
Posted: January 24, 2010 Filed under: Zyonism Israel and 21st Century global conflicts, Zyonism Israel's a focal point in 21st Century global relations | Tags: Zyonism Israel's role in the 21st Century 1 Comment »Zyonism: Introduction and “mission statement:”
Zyonism, is successor to Zionism, a movement that was designed to, and then succeeded, in establishing a Jewish State in Palestine. Now that Israel is fait accompli, enhancing its standing as a viable and substantial participant in the global community, is the mission undertaken by Zyonism!
Zyonism will continue efforts to enhance the position of the State of Israel in twenty-first Century global politics; its objectives are to analyze and explore solutions to issues that affect Israel and its allies around the world.
Inasmuch as Israel, in spite of its small size, influences a non-trivial part of international relations, its actions, as is its mere existence, represent a pivotal element in inter-nations dialogue regarding the future of a peaceful world. The fact that the word Zyonism is enough to trigger rage among Arab, and other, Muslim nations, will be dealt with. A review of the matter will be assessed with candor, and will be utilized in exploring means through which to neutralize this unfounded anger of many generations.
Israel’s historic mission to the world, a mission that was first expressed in the Old Testament , is of utmost significance to all those who belive in god, particularly to members of the three principal monotheist religions. In spite of having differing views regarding the intended Divine role of the Jewish people, and of the State of Israel, all believers realize that the Jewish people have a unique role.
The Zyonism blog will review those many and complex relationships between Israel and other nations, it will attempt to propose solutions where problems exist. The blog will consider all views regarding International relations, both pros and cons, regarding Israel’s role in today’s world. A particular attention will be given to Iran’s threat to the global community. Israel’s role as the most viable deterrent to Iran’s danger, will be evaluated analyzed.
Understanding that the mere fact that Israel exists irritates Arabs, and that its existence triggers rage in the Islamic World, should help Zyonism assess causes and potential solutions to the conflict between Islam and the West.
The conflict that started with the fact that Ishmael’s birthrights were “stolen,” a conflict that moved forward to the Koran where Allah resents the facts that the Jewish people would not accept him over their god, is not something that can be resolved without a great deal of understanding, sympathy, and effort. A conflict of thousands of years cannot be resolved overnight. The dispute between Islam and the non-Islamic monotheist religions, however, can reach resolution providing reasonable members of these religions deal reasonably with one another; Zyonism will attempt to identify potential solutions to the problem.
For additional publications sympathetic to causes of the Zyoinsm blog, please go to: www.dangoor.wordpress.com
The Zyonism creator and blog author: Dan Goor
Posted: January 28, 2010 Filed under: Exploring means for reducing the chasm-of-trust between Obama's Administration and US allies, Uncategorized | Tags: Exposing the chasm-of-trust created by Obama with allies 2 Comments »Zyonism: Introduction and “mission statement:”
Zyonism, is successor to Zionism, a movement that was designed to, and then succeeded, in establishing a Jewish State in Palestine. Now that Israel is fait accompli, enhancing its standing as a viable and substantial participant in the global community, is the mission undertaken by Zyonism!
Zyonism will continue efforts to enhance the position of the State of Israel in twenty-first Century global politics; its objectives are to analyze and explore solutions to issues that affect Israel and its allies around the world.
Inasmuch as Israel, in spite of its small size, influences a non-trivial segment of international relations; Israel’s actions, as is its mere existence, represent a pivotal element in inter-nations dialogue regarding the future of a peaceful world. The fact that the word Zyonism (or Zionism) is enough to trigger rage among Arab, and other, Muslim nations, will be dealt with. A review of the matter will be done with candor, and will be utilized to explore means through which to neutralize this unfortunate, and unfounded, anger of many generations.
The Zyonism blog will also offer an insight beyond that demonstrated by the West in general, and by the Obama Administration, in particular; an insight into the likes of Iran, Libya, and Syria (to name but just a few of the more radical Islamic regimes around the world.) Having studies, and then gaining extensive practrical experience with the three principal monotheist religions, and with frequent exposure to Mid East countries, Dan Goor will offer an understanding of today’s global conflict, not previously exposed while avoiding political sensitivities. Avoiding “political correctness,” Zyonism will call a spade a spade, it will attempt to do so with total disregard to political, or national, sensitivities.
In addition to dealing with the broad picture, Zyonism will explore means for aiding some of the victims of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict; those non-combatants who suffered needlessly because of current situation.
About Dan Goor; founder of Zyonism:
Dan Goor
Dan Goor is a Physicist, author, and a Political Scientist. Dan Goor believes that there are no legitimately pure left or pure right in politics, they are all, he believes, hybrids. In many ways Goor is very liberal, in others he is quite conservative; his beliefs are based on specific issues, and on specific cases.
As a person who witnessed, participated, and therefor understands terrorist acts first hand, Goor has an in-depth understanding of ideology and religion driven terrorism (which in some cases, based on circumstances, some consider “freedom-fighting.”)
In a theses towards a Masters of Arts in Law and Diplomacy (MALD) Goor explains in some depth the working of religion driven political terrorism, an area that he not only studied, but one in which he has first hand knowledge; knowledge he acquired prior to Israel’s War of Independence.
In the Seventies, Dan Goor established and managed a computer sales and service operation in Iran, it was an Iranian company that functioned independently, but was legally a subsidiary of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC.) Unlike most operatives in Iran at the time, Goor acquired a work permit, and was involved with all facets of the Iranian company. A distributor hired by Goor was partially owned by a son of the Shah’s twin sister, allowing Goor access to many people in high places, and to gain a significant insight into the Iranian culture of the time. Dan Goor left Iran a few months before the Shah left for America, Goor left to never return, he suggested to DEC that it terminate all operation in the country because the turmoil that he uniquely foresaw coming….
Dan Goor is deeply concerned by the apparent lack of loyalties to allies demonstrated by the Obama’s Administration. Alarmed by prospects of United States losing its position of authority in the Twenty-first Century, Goor will attempt to analyze those Administration actions that drives the United States away from its allies.
Of particular concern to Goor is Obama’s distancing himself from the State of Israel, the only dependable and stable ally that the United States has in the Middle East. Towards an end of curbing the growth in the chasm-of-trust that the Obama Administration created with Israel, Dan Goor will expose his readers to problems that the new, and very young American President, has caused in United States relations with many of its [historical] allies.
Not staying with allies, appears to be a trait that goes beyond that of the United States, President Obama, in his personal life, seems to also put expediency before commitments, and loyalty. The Reverend Wright, and Bill Ayer, are but two examples of that characteristic of the President. In the case of friends, it can be viewed as a character flaw, and should be dealt with accordingly; on the international arena, however, such a trait could cause severe rapture in United States foreign policy, its relations with allies, and its credibility.
Returning to who Dan Goor is, one may wish to learn that in addition to being an inventor with over thirty patents, Dan Goor is a Political Scientist with keen interest in current events. Having transferred technology to a number of “third world” countries. Through exposure, academic studies, and extensive reading, Dan Goor developed an understanding of other cultures, and learned to recognize sensitivities of other people.
His work, his studies, and the environment in which he grew-up, prompted Dan Goor to study the roots of those he fears that could have an adverse effects on his world. To that end he studies the Koran, and attended Graduate School at a fundamentalist Christian University. With a Jewish upbringing, Dan Goor has a non-trivial level of understanding of those who follow the three leading Monotheist religions.
Believing that more innocent human life has been lost through the ages in the name of religion (the Holocaust, and Islamic Jihad, to name two of the most significant culprits,) Dan Goor has studied the way various countries deal with the threat of religious driven terror. As the result of his life-long examination of religious conflict, Dan Goor is uniquely aware of some of the most effective ways to deal with such threats, and the causes of said threats.
Goor worked and studied in many countries, including some in the Middle East, Asia, Europe, and the United States. With his wife, Euphemia Patricia (Pat) Goor, Dan now lives in Colorado Springs, while he and Pat also spend about half their time in Tel-Aviv Israel.
Dan Goor earned two Masters degrees from a Harvard affiliated school (the Fletcher School,) and a degree in Physics from Colorado State University; he is also a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Sloan Fellow. Additionally, Goor studied Physics and religion at Abilene Christian University, and completed many advanced industrial training courses.
Dan Goor’s blogs (www.dangoor.wordpress.com ; www.zyonism.com ; www.zyonism.wordpress.com; www.zyonism.org; www.zyonism.wordpress.org
are not published on a regular schedule, they are generally triggered by events, and the author’s mood.
Please view: Zyonism “mission statement,” that continues in next write-up.
US + allies = Nuevo Imperialism: “In the name of [world] peace.” Libya, a case in point.
Posted: April 16, 2011 Filed under: Imperialism in the name of peace, US and "allies" Imperialism "in thr name of peace" Leave a comment »The “Nuevo-Imperialism!” Libya, a sovereign state, and a member in good standing of the United Nations, never requested external help to change its regime. The Twenty-first Century Nuevo-Imperialists took that role upon themselves, a dangerous behavior that may return the global community to hinder-years when such an unacceptable behavior was the norm for political powers of the time.
The United Nations organization does not have authority to authorize the use of force, its Security Council may have some marginal, and very limited authority to approve some military action. The Security Council authority is only a “back door,” authority; in the recent case of Libya it used its authority to approve the “protection of civilians,” a vague and very unprecise action.
Since the United States and its allies are calling for a change of regime in Libya, and because their actions are designed towards that objectives, their bombing of Libya is clearly illegal.
Additionally, had the “rebels” in Libya asked for United States, The United States Security Council, or Nato’s help, the situation might have been different. But the Libyan rebels have no face, no identity, they are neither homogeneous, nor the representatives of the Libyan people, and therefore had no legitimate authority to formally request, or receive international help for their largely undefined goals.
US and Nato activities in Libya are shades of French, Dutch, and British imperialism of old. The United States and their allies seem to feel that they have the right to determine the rights and wrongs of political regimes. George W. Bush, with Tony Blair in Iraq, followed into Afghanistan, neither were at the request of the sovereign, were a beginning of today’s “Nuevo imperialism,” which seem to guide the international behavior of the United States and it allies. No international law, norm, or rules of acceptable behavior apply to the new imperialism of the Western powers in today’s world…
Iran Conflict: Should Israel “Wag the Dog?” Or, regarding Iran, Obama must “fish, or cut bait!”
Posted: February 24, 2012 Filed under: Will Obama's Islamophobia leave Israel with the task of dealing with Iran? | Tags: Will Israel be foced to do US dirty work in Iran? Leave a comment »President Obama seems to fear conflict with Muslims. Yes, he did get bin Laden killed, but that was the result of an effort that started many years ago. “Taking out” bin Laden was a matter of necessity, not choice; the same hold true with other al Qaeda operatives that President Obama eliminated. Nore power for the Commander-in-Chief.
But: When it comes to real Islamic challenges, the young American President seems to be timid. Most alarming is his dealing with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the Ayatollah Khomeini as they are preparing to become a nuclear power, and perhaps destroy the State of Israel. President Barak Hussein Obama, and his Secretary of State Clinton, keep insisting that sanctions and diplomacy can work, they are doing so in spite of clear statements from Ahmadinejad that as long as the United States is [even] friendly with Israel, Iran will not engage in dialogue with it.
The Iranians are serious! Actions by Iran, starting with reverse sanctions against the West will start to have significant effect on the world economy, an unhealthy economy, as it is! Cutting oil to Europe would sooner, or later add to price of Gasoline in the United States, and would get Americans to either to recognize the problem as one directly associated with Islam’s desire for world domination, and insist that the United States take action against Iran, or feel that if the United States forsakes Israel, matters “will return to normal,” a myth, but a potential fall out of US inaction. Would Obama inaction cause the return in the United States of bumper stickers stating: “Less Jews, more oil?” Or, would the United States live-up to it singular “superpower?”
In spite of all Unites States support of Israel, including important supply of bunker-busting bombs, Israel is in no position to take on Iran without help. Israel may win a short-term conflict, but should it be forced to do so, the toll on its economy would be enormous, the fragility of its existence become even more alarming than it is now.
If the Unites States relinquish its role as the super-power and essentially force Israel to do its dirty work with Iran, what credibility would the United States have remaining?
Is Obama reluctant to hold a hard-line with Islamic regimes the result of his formative years among Muslims, or is it because he doe not have the intestinal fortitude to do the job for which he was elected? There not seem to be an answer to these questions, but the results are alarming! The United States must have a chief executive who can stand for its interests regardless what phobias he, or she, may have.
Shared with: www.dangoor.wordpress.com
Bachmann’s credible view of Obama’s foreign policy; a miracle!
Posted: February 19, 2012 Filed under: Bachmann's credible view of Obama's foreign policy | Tags: Bachmann right re Obama's Israel policy Leave a comment »I never thought that a day will come when I can agree with Michele Bachmann, but a miracle happened, and the day came!
Congresswoman Bachmann suggestion that the Obama Administration is conducting a failing foreign policy, is right on! Contrary to my views of MS Bachmann, views which do not generally put her in a favorable light, her blind, yet just, support of Israel, and her views regarding Obama’s handling of foreign policy, are two bright spots in the otherwise inept lady from Minnesota.
Killing bin Laden was a high point; leaving Iraq was a good move, but a politically motivated action that came much too early, and that will simply push Iraq deeper into Iran’s sphere of influence.
As to Israel: In the area of supplying Israel with military equipment, the Obama Administration did OK, but when it comes to moral support, and friendship, it has fallen short. Obama’s desire to be friendly with Islamic nations seem to be contrary to what those countries expect America to do regarding Israel. For example, Ahmadinejad of Iran simply told the US that as long as its is friendly with Israel, it cannot have diplomatic relations with Iran.
Another part of its misdealing with friends, the Obama Administration weaken Europe’s missile shield to please Russia, and while encouraging nations to remove dictators in favor of free government, is standing on the sidelines as “Syria is Burning,” and Assad is slaughtering civilians.
Failing to curb North Korea’s nuclear and missile development, pushing Libya, Tunisia, and likely Egypt towards Sharia law, and most alarming, the Obama Administration total mishandling of Iran.
Backing Bachmann’s view, any objective observer can ascertain that short of a miracle, a war with Iran is now inevitable. If the US is too timid to initiate such war, Israel maybe forced to start the conflict, but make no mistake about it, if an armed conflict begins, the United States would be dragged into it, perhaps shouting and screaming, but the both feet, and with easy way out.
Is al-Queda outmaneuvering the US in Syria?
Posted: February 12, 2012 Filed under: Is al-Queda out maneuvering US is Syria? | Tags: al-Queda stronger hand than US in Syria, Is US outmaneuvered in Syria? Leave a comment »“Syria is Burning,” it is burning with flames that could mean freedom, but that may turn the country into another Sharia ruled piece of the Middle East puzzle.
Syria, a country with impressive history, and with advanced culture could have become a small democratic island in the Arab world, should its rebels received support from the West, or rather from some US led coalition, but the United States chose to stand by while Syria is burning…
Up to a point the US stood behind Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt, all primitive nations that will be adopting Sharia law, and turning against the United States and its allies. Syria, the cultural entity in the region, a country that could have become a stepping-stone for democracy in the Middle East, is being neglected by the United States as part of its totally inept foreign policy.
Al-Queda’s chief al-Zawahri is now calling for his people to support the Syrian revolt so that he and his organization can gain influence in the region. Since under Assad Syria was the pipeline between Iran, Hizbollah, and Hamas, a Syria under al-Queda’s influence will strengthen these organizations, and weaken Israel’s defensive position, and the Arab Gulf states.
As things stand, Iran would be pleased to have Assad, on of its more reliable clients, remain in power. But, if the removal of Assad were inevitable, then an Islamic country under Sharia law, and with al-Queda presence, would be a welcomed option.
United States inaction in Syria created an opening for al-Queda, and is serving as another demonstration of a frightfully inept American foreign policy in the region. It may not be too late for the United States Administration to follow Senator McCain’s advice and find means to help the Syrian rebels while gaining some much-needed influence in the region.
US/Israel inevitable 2012 Iran action; preparing the “bunker-busters!” Stake is in the ground, and only Iran can stop it.
Posted: February 11, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized, Unless Iran capitulates stake in ground for US/Israel Iran action | Tags: 2012 US Inevitable Iran action unless..., Stake in ground for US Iran action Leave a comment »US/Israel, inevitable 2012 Iran action; preparing the “bunker-busters!” The stake is in the ground, and only Iran can stop it now.
Military’s request for funds to ready twenty of its “bunker-busting,” bombs, some for its own supply, some to upgrade those in the hands of the Israelis is an early signal of inevitable action against Iran’s nuclear facilities. Since the critical Iranian facilities are deep underground, the bunker-busters will be a weapon of choice, perhaps accompanied by a number of tactical nukes from both the US and Israeli arsenals.
US and Israeli strategies are likely to include missiles from the Persian Gulf, air from US bases in Gulf States, and likely flight from Israel over Jordanian and Saudi air space. Even if the United States may play a support role because of political issues in an election year, its initial request for $91,000,000.00 for bunker-buster preparation, is but a first step in inclusion of the Congress in action that will likely take place before the 2012 election. The inevitable action is at a stage now that only action by Iran can stop its inevitability, and Iran will have to open up all its facilities, stop its enrichment program, and allow for permanent inspectors in all its facilities.
Since the US left Iraq, and Israel will not have that airspace available as a route to Iran, and as Egypt’s new rulers will not likely let Israel use the Suez, as did Mubarak, the US role in a mission to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities has been expended, including the use of UA resources now in the Gulf.
Count on the 2012 US election to shift emphasis from the economy and social issues, and to energy from the Gulf States, and the inevitable action against Iran.
Shared with: www.dangoor.wordpress.com
Syria: A case of selective morality. Why is US on sideline while “Syria is burning?”
Posted: February 4, 2012 Filed under: US should not delay its support of Syria's revolt. | Tags: US must help Syria's revolt Leave a comment »Recently, the United States and its allies supported revolts in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt; all three are in the process to adopt Sharia law, and distant themselves from the West. From the “free world,” if you will. Some short-term results of these actions include riots in Egypt, and the likelihood that it would terminate its peace agreement with Israel, while essentially turn it back on the United States. Egypt is not the Egypt of old with ancestors who contributed a great deal to world culture; Egypt is an Arab country with nomads’ roots.
Libya and Tunisia are tribal countries, backwards and ready to adopt strong Sharia law, and an environment similar to what the Taliban had…
On the other hand, Syria, a country who contributed a great deal to world civilization, is allowed, “to burn” by a ruthless dictator, the son of another dictator. Syria with a significant intelligentsia, and impressive history could become the key to unlocking the door to Middle East peace.
Neither the Chinese, nor the Russians are concerned about civility, or civil rights, in the case of Syria both countries are interested in economic gains. The United States tried to pass a Security Council Resolution to curb Assad, to only be confronted by vetoes from the Russia, and Chinese. Even though the United States is not the world policeman, nor the guardian of freedom, as the only “super power” and a Judeo/Christian country with moral obligation to all people, getting involved in Syria may be inevitable.
Supporting Syria’s move towards freedom and democracy should not be viewed as an option; it should be accepted as an obligation, and take place without much additional delay. Among other things, a democratic Syria is likely to be the foundation of MidEast civility.
Shared with: www.dangoor.wordpress.com
While “Syria is burning,” [why is there]: No Western support given to Syria democratisation?
Posted: January 29, 2012 Filed under: US and allies need to support move to Syrian secular democracy for regional stability. | Tags: Why is US on sidelines when "Syria id Burning?" Leave a comment »“Syria is burning;” why is no Western support given to democratisation?
When reviewing the support of revolts in Libya (the backward tribal country that falls under Sharia law,) Egypt on its way towards becoming an Islamic nation, and other countries than Syria, one must wonder who does the thinking in Washington, and why are they not aiming at the most promising targets, in this case, Syria. Why is Assad allowed to slaughter his people, while other were not allowed to simply manage autocracies?
It is time for the United States and its allies to support the Syrian revolution and help the Syrian intelligentsia create a secular democracy that could be the hub to Middle East stability.
Those countries that the US and its allies freed from autocratic rule that adopted Sharia law, cannot, and will not be friends of the United States and any of its [non-Muslim] allies. Living by Quran edicts eliminate the possibility of joining the [secular] global community. Unlike the Bible, the Quran insists on a number of behavioral issues (din, or way of life) that are a must if you wish to be a Muslim, no exceptions. The Quran does not have provisions for leaving the religion, except for death!
The Muslim Brotherhood already explained what it intends to do, not actions that will be favorable to the West.
As to trade with Israel, the US, and the EU gain a great deal from such trade, not even considering that Jewish interests will continue to be supportive in both places. Companies like Google, Microsoft, and other leaders that have a great deal of software developed in Israel. The Defense Department is getting a great deal from its exchange with Israel (Iron Shield, much drone technology, fire-control-system, feedback of desert operations, etc.)
Both the EU, and the US have more to lose than gain if they curtailed trade, and general relations with with Israel. Should Syria become a secular democracy, peace with Israel, and the elimination of support for Iranian support to Hamas and Hizzbollah, would likely follow…
As an aside: Arab League attempts to settle the situation in Syria cannot work, not only the League the proverbial “toothless tiger,” it could easily be bogged down when trying to resove differences where both competing sides are Muslims!
President Obama: “Begging” for a meeting with Iran? When will America regain its self respect?
Posted: January 19, 2012 Filed under: How can Obama beg a meeting with Iran? | Tags: Obama begging to meet Iran's leader Leave a comment »President Obama: “Begging” for a meeting with Iran? When will America regain its self-respect?
In face of pronouncements by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that Iran will not communicate with the United States as long as the United States has favorable relations with the State of Israel; how can America’s President stoop so low as to request that Iran’s leadership meet with him?
Iran’s conditions that the US severs relations with Israel before it would communicate with the United States are consistent with Iran’s formal statements regarding its desire to and intent to destroy the State of Israel, a position that should actually be viewed as an act of war against an US ally.
Rather than to request, or rather beg for a meeting with Iran’s leadership, America’s President should demand that Iran formally recognize Israel to exist. America’s President, however, stoops down and request to meet with Iran, another demonstration of the inept US foreign policy; when will the US regain its backbone, and start acting like the leader of the free world rather than a toothless-tiger?
Expect Israel’s treatment of Syrian refugees improvement over Arabs of Palestinians.
Posted: January 11, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized, Unlike Arab countries that do not accept Palestinians refugees Israel will respect refugees from Syria | Tags: Israel will accept and respect Syrian refugees Leave a comment »One of the major problems in the Middle East is that of “Palestinians” refugees; no Arab country would absorb them, or treat them with respect. The issue is particularly grievance since those same Arab countries that suggested that Arab civilians leave Israel in 1948 when they were determined to destroy Israel started most of the refugee problem. Most interesting is the case of Jordan, since Jordan in reality was a part of Mandatory Palestine and those Palestinian refugees in Jordan are as much Jordanians as any Jordanian citizen.
When Assad is removed from office, an unfortunate by-product that one can expect is that the minority from where he comes, will be discriminated against, many will likely to flee to Israel, the Golan Heights, in particular. Israel already, at least in principal, agreed to make civilized provisions for dealing with such refugees.
A change of regime in Syria would be very welcomed; it may be a key to solving a large part of the peace issue in the Middle East. Since under Assad who runs an Iranian client state that shields, supports, and nurtures Hizbollah, and Hamas. Should Iran lose its conduit to Hamas and Hizbollah, those two organizations will likely lose their lifeline, which will bring some new level of stability to the region.
Again: Ahmadinejad calling Obama to task! Will Obama ever react?
Posted: January 9, 2012 Filed under: Death sentence to an American strait hormuz closure and Nuke advancements will Obama ever react? | Tags: Iran again challengin Obama will he ever react? Leave a comment »Continuing Uranium enrichment, exercising in the Strait of Hormuz, and suggesting that the Strait could be closed at Iran’s will, and now sentencing an American young man to death, for treason, should cause violent United States reaction; not so from the Obama Administration. How long will the United States allow Iran to threatened world peace without severe consequences from The United States and the “free world,” that it leads?
Iran’s threat in face of rapid developments which will likely to lead to a nuclear arsenal, Ahmadinejad recent visit to Venezuela, presently, with Hugo Chavez at the helm, an enemy of the United States, is just another red-flag in front a Obama, the American bull!
Will the United States under the leadership of Barak Hussein Obama, ever rise up to the Iranian challenge, or will an ally, such as Israel, have to deal with the threat?