Another chapter: Israel/US Chasm of trust. Or, Will Ahmadinejad’s new challenge about Israel go unanswered?

Ahmadinejad Chief of staff, Mashaei, suggests that Iran can destroy Israel, the “Zionist Regine” as he calls it, in one week.

With vast United States force in the region, will the United States President, Barak Hussein Obama, inform Ahmadinejad that an attack on Israel will be paramount to an attack on the United States? And, will the United States President inform Iran that the United States could do away with Iran on a shorter order than Iran can even dream of destroying Israel?

Or, will President Obama, with his strong Islamic sympathies, roots, and instincts, simply let the Islamic Republic of Iran continue its belligerent talk about annihilating Israel, go unanswered?

For President Obama to respond to Iran now, while there is still a major presence of United States military resources in the region, would be credible; to wait until US starts to withdraw troops from the region, and let Iran continue with its boasting ,could finally lead to an open confrontation between Iran and Israel. If a war did break, it will likely be a war in which Israel, with its Nukes, superior air and sea power, is likely to win! Winning such war, however, could not be accomplished without significant cost to Israel, and the stability of the region, and perhaps to the stability of whole world. 

Will President Obama demonstrate world leadership and respond to Iran’s newest threat?  Or, will Barak Hussein Obama, as he has done in the past, simply let Iran continue to ridicule him, and the United States, at every turn?

Limbaugh fantasizes: Critz a “Democrat Limbaugh…”

Mark Critz is not a blind ideologue, but he is rather a rational person who accept some conservative ( of the Limbaugh ilk) ideas, and some liberal ideas, based on their merit, not ideology. On the other hand Limbaugh is an inflexible ideologue who under no circumstances should attempt to compare himslf to the much more rational Senator elect Critz…

In order not to admit outright that the Democrats won in Pennsylvania, Limbaugh decide that he would convince the world that the winner, Mark Critz, is a “Democrat Limbaugh.” The  rational Limbaugh used has to do with the fact that in some areas Senator elect Critz is flexible and even agrees with a limited number of Limbaugh’s conservative ideas.

In reviewing some of Critz ideas, I must inform Mr. Limbaugh that he is not now, never was, and can never become a Mark Critz; he, Limbaugh is too myopic, too narrow-minded to be able to emulate Senator elect Critz, let alone even play in the same league. Limbaugh, Critz is no Limbaugh, and Limbaugh cannot even qualify as a “poor people Critz,” Critz is out of your league Limbaugh, accept it!

The pitiful Limbaugh: A bigot in conservative clothing…

A while back Rush Limbaugh attacked a mortgage effort by the Obama Administration as a Shylock mortgage effort; a clear anti-Semitic effort based on Shylock, the unscrupulous Shakespearean character. Today on his radio show Limbaugh outdid himself.

Speaking of the Arizona immigration law Limbaugh stated that President Obama complaints that the law discriminates against Mexicans are unfounded, and that the President does not really care about Mexicans…

“None of Obama key advisers are Mexicans,” Limbaugh said, “it’s Axelrod and Manuel, no Mexicans.” Since Manuel and Axelrod are Jewish, Limbaugh anti-Semitic bent, again reared its ugly head.

“And look at his appointments,” Limbaugh continued, “Kagan to the Supreme Court is not Mexican.” She, of course, is another of Limbaugh unspoken but yet targeted Jewish targets. And just to keep the discussion honest, and to keep his listeners from confusing the Latino Stotomayor with a Mexican, Limbaugh made it clear that she is not a Mexican, by informing his audience of her Puerto Rican, not Mexican, origin: “Obama has not room for Mexican, it is all just talk.”

Hiding behind his conservative “causes” Limbaugh is not able to keep his bigotry hidden. Listening carefully to ”the Rush,” it quickly becomes obvious that to him, you must be white, and a  non-Jew, to qualify as an important part of United States society. Not only is Limbaugh a bigot, the man is a white supremest who tries to hide behind a cloak of conservatism; it won’t work!

In spite of having some twenty-five listeners, and even though he has the Republican hierarchy in the palm of his hand, Limbaugh is not a true conservative, he does not even understand the concept.  Conservatism to Limbaugh is a matter of convenience; maintain a society with wide disparities, rich and poor, allowing those in the middle to move either up, or down, and not have the Government help those who may need help, especially if they are not white. By default being one of the GOP main voices, Limbaugh may help negate many of the gains the Republicans may have been able to make in 2010. Attitudes Limbaugh preaches can do nothing to improve the Republicans chasm with minorities, and reduce their potential gains in the upcoming November mid-term election.

Limbaugh, Islamic Cleric Sedighi, and God; or is it Allah?

To some twenty-five million Americans Rush Limbaugh is the closest thing to the “second coming” of Christ…When the Icelandic volcano erupted, Rush Limbaugh suggested to his vast audience that the event might well have been God’s reply to Obama’s healthcare plan! It was as if Rush Limbaugh speaks with God, perhaps he was “under the influence,” as he often seems to be?

In line with Rush Limbaugh’s views of God’s punishment of Obama, and his people, Muslim Cleric Hojatoleslam Kazami Sedighi, suggested that earthquakes are the result of women not dressing in the appropriate manner. Sedighi spoke on behalf of Allah, Limbaugh on behalf of the Christian God; or, are they one and the same?

Rush Limbaugh must be more careful than to use his vast influence to suggest irrational suggestion about God’s punishment of Obama. If there is a Judeo Christian God, such God will more likely punish Limbaugh, than President Obama. After all, in spite of Rush Limbaugh claims to be telling the truth over ninety percent of the time, Limbaugh lies and violate the ninth Commandment: Though should not bear false witness, with impunity. A vivid example was Limbaugh recent declaration that the would be Time-square bomber was a registered Democrat…

With every day that goes by, Limbaugh more closely resembles Islamic voices who belive that they speak for Allah. The fact that Mr. Limbaugh has great influence is alarming; how can the significant number of Americans accept Limbaugh’s words, words based on his ideology and views, and not on facts? Like many Muslim leaders, especially Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Limbaugh likes to refer to those he opposes, such as Barak Obama and his Administration, as ”the regime,” a total misnomer when dealing with a duly elected democratic government. Ahmadinejad has been referring the ”Zionist regime,” now Limbaugh borrowed the term to use when speaking of Obama; what a sham!

Those who listen to Rush Limbaugh, please do so with care. At best the man is delusional, at worse he simply sacrifices everything, including the truth, in order to make his point, in order to sell his ideology, and destroy those who oppose to his views!

Score another for Ahmadinejad; will Gates words force Israel to nuke Iran?

The inept dealing by the Obama Administration of the Islamic World, and especially of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad continues! Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama continue to allow Ahmadinejad to look like a hero to the Islamic World by his defiance of United States demands, even when they are supported by the United Nations.

But now, another United States statement, one by Secretary Gates, makes Ahmadinejad appear invincible. Secretary Gates speaking of other issues let it slip that the Defense Department budget is not likely to allow for action against Iran; exactly what the Iranians wanted to hear.

What is left if the “free world” is to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear power? The simple answer is: Israel!

Is the Obama Administration pushing Israel to attack Iran and destroy its nuclear works? Will Israel be only the second nation, after the United States on Japan, to use nuclear weapons?

If Israel does elect to do the “dirty work” for the United States and rid the world of Iran’s nuclear threat, will the United States be viewed as “keeping its word” by not directly using nukes? Not likely; what a sham it would be, what a disgrace for the only “super-power” to force Israel, in spite of its miniature size, to become one of the most powerful nation on earth.